Legal Opinion
Jang v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 29, 2017No. 2016-1275; 2016-1575PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHEN, Circuit Judge.
This dispute between G. David Jang, M.D. (Dr. Jang) and Boston Scientific Corp. and Scimed Life Systems, Inc. (collectively, BSC), more than a decade old, returns to us for a fourth time. In the latest appeal of this case involving U.S. Patent No. 5,922,021 (’021 Patent) and BSC’s sales of several coronary stents (collectively, Express stent), Dr. Jang challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) on the ground that no reasonable jury could have found that BSC’s Express stent did not literally infringe claims 1 and 8 (the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ucb, Inc. v. Watson Laboratories Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Sprint Commc'ns Co. v. Cox Commc'ns Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- AgroFresh Inc. v. Essentiv LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- BNJ Leasing, Inc. v. Portabull Fuel Service, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022
- Fluidigm Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ionpath, Inc., a Delaware CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.