Legal Opinion
Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC v. X-Body Equipment, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 12, 2015No. 2014-1829PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STOLL, Circuit Judge.
Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC (“Advanced Steel”) appeals the district court’s summary judgment that X-Body Equipment, Inc. and Jewell Attachments, LLC (collectively, “X-Body”) do not infringe the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,061,-950 (“the '950 patent”). For the reasons below, we affirm as to both literal infringement and infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
Background
Advanced Steel owns by assignment the '950 patent, describing systems and methods of loading shipping containers with bulk material for storage or transport. Material is loaded into the top…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Niazi Licensing Corporation v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Vlsi Technology LLC v. Intel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Adapt Pharma Operations v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.