Legal Opinion

Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided March 27, 2001No. C98-2106 MJMPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

MELLOY, District Judge.

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff, Engineered Products Company (“EPC”), asserts patent and trade dress claims against the defendant, Donaldson Company (“Donaldson”), arising from Donaldson’s creation and sale of two air filter indicator devices — the Air Alert, sold from 1997 to 1999, and the NG Air Alert, sold from 1999 through the present. 1 (Doc. no. 1). EPC claims that both devices infringe its patent, U.S. Patent Number 4,445,456 (“the ’456 patent”). Donaldson concedes that the Air Alert infringed the ’456 patent, but, as to that…

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Wing Shing Products (BVI) Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
  3. Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  4. Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
  5. Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A. De C.V.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API