Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 23, 2021No. 2/20PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Devon Jordan Taylor v. State of Maryland No. 2, September Term 2020 Appeals – Preservation – Substantial Compliance. Under Maryland Rule 4-325(e), a party in a criminal trial that wishes to preserve an objection to a jury instruction must (1) object on the record promptly after the court instructs the jury, (2) state the matter to which the party objects, and (3) identify the grounds of the objection. Defense counsel substantially complied with that rule in objecting to the trial court’s anti-CSI effect instruction when counsel objected to the court’s “scientific evidence instruction” after…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Maryland v. KulbickiSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Squire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Gore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Abruquah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  2. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Gross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Kumar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. McGhee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API