Legal Opinion

Gore v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 1, 1987No. 58 September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUCH, Judge.

In this case we must determine whether a trial judge erred when he told a jury in a criminal case that

“one of the attorneys mentioned to you that the evidence was insufficient upon which you could make a finding of guilty as to a certain count. Sufficiency of the evidence is a matter of law. The Court decided that, not the Jury. Whether you believe that evidence beyond a reasonable doubt is for you to decide. But the counts could never go to you if there were not evidence suffi cient under the law; whether you believe it and weigh it so that you have no reasonable doubt is for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Stevenson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Dykes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. In Re Petition for Writ of ProhibitionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API