Legal Opinion
Shoemaker v. Shaug
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 8, 1971No. 421-1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
On June 7, 1966, defendant Shaug leased premises to third-party defendant Schwenker “for the purpose of conducting thereon a tavern business.” The lease is for a term of 4 years and gives the lessee an option to renew for an additional 5 years. The lease provides that:
Lessee shall not, without the written consent of the Lessor or Lessor’s agents, let or sublet the whole or any part thereof, nor assign this lease or any part thereof without the written consent of the Lessor, or Lessor’s agents. This lease shall not be assignable by operation of law. If consent is once given by the Lessor to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dill v. ZielkeWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Income Properties Investment Corp. v. TrefethenWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- John R. Hansen, Inc. v. Pacific International Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- State ex rel. Foley v. Superior Court for King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Coulos v. DesimoneWashington Supreme Court · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mendez v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF PASCO AND FRANKLIN CTY. v. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Housing Authority v. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Dillingham Commercial Co., Inc. v. SpearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Hendrickson v. FreericksAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.