Legal Opinion
Independent Union of Public Service Employees v. County of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 30, 1983No. Civ. 22469PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARR, J.
In this appeal we consider whether the County of Sacramento (County) was required to “meet and confer” with plaintiff Independent Union of Public Service Employees (hereinafter referred to as petitioner) prior to changing the working hours of county custodial workers. (Gov. Code, § 3505.) We conclude the trial court correctly found the meet and confer requirement contained in the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) applicable and shall therefore affirm.
Facts
Petitioner is the certified bargaining agent for the county employees in the operations and maintenance unit, which includes…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- William E. Arnold Co. v. Carpenters District CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- O'MALLEY v. Wilshire Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Building Material & Construction Teamsters' Union v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Choate v. Celite Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- City of Palo Alto v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016
- Claremont Police Officers Ass'n v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.