Legal Opinion

Maner v. Maner

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 20, 1982No. 21801PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

These cases are before us on motions for speedy remedy. The issues we shall address are whether the movants are entitled to a speedy appeal and, if so, whether they have been denied this right, and what relief, if any, this Court can grant to satisfy this right.

Article I, Section 9 of the South Carolina Constitution provides: “All courts shall be public, and every person shall have speedy remedy therein for wrongs sustained.”

In Rylee v. Marett, 121 S. C. 366, 378, 113 S. E. 483, 487 (1922), this Court recognized the right to a speedy remedy could be infringed by the denial of a speedy appeal:

O…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hercules Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  3. McCollum v. SnipesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. LagerquistSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Riley v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keyserling v. BeasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Ex Parte Georgetown Water & Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Sea Cove Development, LLC v. Harbourside Community BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Doe v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
  5. South Carolina Public Interest Foundation v. LucasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API