Legal Opinion
Doe v. American National Red Cross
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided June 10, 1992No. Civ. A. 3:91-0039-19, 3:91-0040-19PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
SHEDD, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. By Order dated March 31, 1992, 788 F.Supp. 884, the Court ruled that certain information which plaintiff sought from defendant through discovery interrogatories,. relating to the identity of an HIV-infected blood donor (“the Donor”), is privileged information not subject to disclosure under S.C.Code Ann. § 44-29-135, and Regulation 61-21G(2)(d), promulgated by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”). See S.C. Reg. Vol. 15, Issue…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Meech v. Hillhaven West, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
- Gibbes v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Gibson v. West Virginia Department of HighwaysWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- Gene H. Samuelson, M. D. v. Anthony F. Susen, M. D., and Peter J. Jannetta, M. DCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Broome v. TruluckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Salt Lake Child & Family Therapy Clinic, Inc. v. FrederickUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Salt Lake Child & Family Therapy Clinic, Inc. v. FrederickUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004