Legal Opinion

Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Lambrecht

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 2003No. C7-01-1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYER, Justice.

This appeal arises out of the dismissal by summary judgment of a lessee’s claim of loss of going-concern damages in a condemnation proceeding. The district court granted the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint -Paul’s (HRA) motion for partial summary judgment against Shannon Kelly’s, Inc. (Shannon Kelly’s). The court determined that Shannon Kelly’s could not establish a claim for loss of going-concern damages as a matter of law; and in any event, the claim was precluded by certain lease language and the acceptance of relocation benefits by Shannon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. v. Widness Ex Rel. WidnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Airports Commission v. NobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. Alaska Laser Wash, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. LambrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Rasmussen v. Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. Alaska Laser Wash, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API