Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Lambrecht
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
This appeal arises out of the dismissal by summary judgment of a lessee’s claim of loss of going-concern damages in a condemnation proceeding. The district court granted the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint -Paul’s (HRA) motion for partial summary judgment against Shannon Kelly’s, Inc. (Shannon Kelly’s). The court determined that Shannon Kelly’s could not establish a claim for loss of going-concern damages as a matter of law; and in any event, the claim was precluded by certain lease language and the acceptance of relocation benefits by Shannon…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. v. Widness Ex Rel. WidnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Metropolitan Airports Commission v. NobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. Alaska Laser Wash, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. LambrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Rasmussen v. Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. Alaska Laser Wash, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016