Rasmussen v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal, appellants challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment on their breach-of-contract and damages claims arising out of a con demnation petition. Because respondent did not breach the lease by initiating condemnation proceedings and because the lease prohibits appellants from recovering a takings award, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellants Ronald and Judith Rasmussen have operated a Tires Plus store under a series of leases at the same location in St. Anthony since the early 1980s. In July 1996, the Rasmussens entered into their current lease…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Farmers' Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Goodyear Shoe Machinery Co. v. Boston Terminal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.