Legal Opinion

State v. Holloway

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 5, 1996No. 95-2575-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Susan Holloway was originally sentenced as a repeat offender for one count each of prostitution and obstructing an officer. Pursuant to § 973.13, Stats., the trial court commuted the sentences to the maximum permitted for the underlying offenses because the repeater convictions had not been properly proven. However, the court altered the structure of the sentences from concurrent to consecutive. On this appeal, Holloway contends that the trial court lacked authority to restructure the sentences. We reject Holloway's argument and affirm the judgments.

Background

Holloway was charged as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grobarchik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Cunningham v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  4. State v. WilksCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. VolkCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  2. State v. MaronCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  3. State v. SeeleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  4. State v. ColesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. State v. FennellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API