Legal Opinion

State v. Coles

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 29, 1997No. 96-0351-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

The principal issue on appeal is whether a felony sentence imposed against the appellant, Joseph C. Coles, must be deemed a concurrent sentence as a matter of law. Coles contends that the challenged sentence must be concurrent because the trial court did not expressly state that the sentence was consecutive to a "time served" misdemeanor sentence which the trial court had imposed moments earlier at the same sentencing hearing.

In a postconviction ruling, the trial court rejected Coles's argument. Instead, the court ruled that, despite its failure to expressly label the challenged sentence as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BoettcherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. RohlCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  3. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  4. Struzik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. LipkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WillettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  2. State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API