State v. Coles
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
The principal issue on appeal is whether a felony sentence imposed against the appellant, Joseph C. Coles, must be deemed a concurrent sentence as a matter of law. Coles contends that the challenged sentence must be concurrent because the trial court did not expressly state that the sentence was consecutive to a "time served" misdemeanor sentence which the trial court had imposed moments earlier at the same sentencing hearing.
In a postconviction ruling, the trial court rejected Coles's argument. Instead, the court ruled that, despite its failure to expressly label the challenged sentence as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BoettcherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. RohlCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Struzik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. LipkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WillettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014