Legal Opinion

Doe v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2012No. S058601; S058634PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

These opposing petitions for writs of mandamus challenge a trial court order allowing the release, to the press and to the public, of redacted versions of 1,247 “ineligible volunteer” files belonging to defendant Boy Scouts of America (BSA). Those files contain information regarding child sexual abuse complaints against BSA volunteers from 1965 to 1985. The trial court had admitted the files, and BSA’s actions in response to those complaints, into evidence, in the jury trial of the matter below. To decide these mandamus petitions, we must examine the contours of the “open courts” clause of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. MacEwan v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State Ex Rel. Oregonian Publishing Co. v. DeizOregon Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. MacBaleOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Wittemyer v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  4. John Doe No. 2 v. Boy Scouts of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  5. I. H. v. AmmiOregon Supreme Court · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API