Legal Opinion

I. H. v. Ammi

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 2022No. S069072PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

406 Argued and submitted September 23, a peremptory writ of mandamus shall issue November 10, 2022 I. H., Petitioner-Relator, v. Azzdine Yahya AMMI, Respondent-Adverse Party. (CC 21PO10337) (SC S069072)

520 P3d 877

In a proceeding under the Family Abuse Prevention Act, the trial court applied the exception to the certified advocate-victim privilege set out in OEC 507-1(3) to communications between relator and her advocate. The court issued an order compelling production of a memory card containing videos of those com- munications, as well as all other advocate-victim communications, and relator…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Ware v. HieberOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Doe v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Longo v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SaccoOregon Supreme Court · 2024
  2. State v. SaccoOregon Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State v. SaccoOregon Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API