McKeever v. Locke-Paddon Co.
California Court of Appeal
1. Right to rely on representations as to value of property sold, notes, 8 Ann. Cas. 1062; 37 L. R. A. 605. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, J., pro tem.
In this action the plaintiff, Frank M. McKeever, recovered a judgment against the defendant, Locke-Paddon Company, a corporation, for damages sustained in connection with a real estate trade into which plaintiff was induced to enter through the fraudulent representations of the defendant. On stipulation of the parties the action was tried before a jury, sitting in an advisory capacity, and a general verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff for $3,500. The trial judge failed to file any written decision, findings of fact, or conclusions of law, or any order adopting the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Rockefeller v. MerrittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Herdan v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Willson v. Municipal Bond Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- McAdams v. McElroyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Commonwealth Trust Co. v. LorainIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Hayward v. WidmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Williams v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.