Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Deihm

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1995No. Docket 164586, 171316PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWahls, J.

Plaintiff, initially through a conservator and later on his own, brought and maintained an action seeking damages for the sexual abuse inflicted upon him by defendant Duwayne Deihm over an eight-year period. Opal Deihm was named as a defendant because she allegedly was aware of, but failed to prevent, the sexual abuse. After the filing of these appeals, Opal passed away and her estate has been substituted as a party to the appeals.

In Docket No. 164586, plaintiff appealed as of right the trial court’s dismissal of the claim against Opal at the conclusion of a jury trial. Opal cross appealed,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Schultz v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. J.S. v. R.T.H.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  5. Casey v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API