Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Haggerty Corridor Partners Ltd. Partnership

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2005No. Docket 124765PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendants own land that was partially taken in condemnation proceedings initiated by plaintiff. At issue is whether the trial court properly allowed defendants to present, in support of their proffered calculation of just compensation, evidence that their *127property had been rezoned from residential to commercial after the taking.

We conclude that the evidence of the posttaking rezoning was irrelevant to the issue of the condemned property’s fair market value at the time of the taking. Because the trial court abused its discretion in admitting this evidence, and because the error was not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. United States v. Twin City Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Searl v. School Dist. No. 2 in Lake Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. STATE, HIGHWAY COMM'R v. GorgaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. People v. KattMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. KowalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. City of Detroit v. DETROIT PLAZA LTD. PARTNERSHIPMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Detroit/Wayne County Stadium Authority v. Drinkwater, Taylor & Merrill, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Department of Transportation v. Frankenlust Lutheran CongregationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Dadd v. Mount Hope ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API