Disciplinary Counsel v. Hoague
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 321.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HOAGUE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hoague,
2000-Ohio-340.] Judges—Misconduct—Six-month suspension stayed—Conviction of coercion— Acting in a manner that does not promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary—Misusing authority of judicial office to achieve personal goal of reprimanding persons believed guilty of reckless driving—Canon 2. (No. 99-1498—Submitted October 12, 1999—Decided March 29, 2000.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HoagueOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Disciplinary Counsel v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. GaulOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Cleveland Bar Assn. v. ClearyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Bachman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Disciplinary Counsel v. KartoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Disciplinary Counsel v. McCormackOhio Supreme Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.