Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2001No. 2001-0412PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 191.] CLEVELAND BAR ASSOCIATION v. CLEARY. [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary,

2001-Ohio-1326.] Judges—Misconduct—Six-month suspension—Extending a sentencing quid pro quo to a pregnant defendant based on judge’s opposition to abortion— Judge acts in a manner “prejudicial to the administration of justice” within meaning of DR 1-102(A)(5), when. (No. 01-412—Submitted May 30, 2001—Decided September 19, 2001.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. ReidOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Broadman v. Commission on Judical PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DixonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. DavieOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. KartoOhio Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API