Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ferreri

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1999No. 98-2636PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Canon 2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct requires that a judge respect and comply with the law and act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. Shortly after one of his decisions was reversed, respondent invited a television reporter into his home and gave an interview in which he maligned the court of appeals, saying that its ruling was “political,” that it was made and written by a law clerk, that the appellate court was influenced by the wife of one of the appellant’s…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. ElumOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HoagueOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. GaulOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re Honorable LamdinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. SquireOhio Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API