Legal Opinion
City of Dallas v. Bergfield
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 11, 1922No. 8793PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVaughan, J.
Many questions are presented by this appeal, but, as the disposition l of 'same will depend upon one, to wit, the validity of the proceedings by and before the special commissioners appointed by the county court of Dallas county at law to assess the damages for the property to be taken to widen St. Paul and Elm streets, and to assess the cost of the improvement against the property in the immediate vicinity thereof and specially benefited thereby, and against the owners thereof, we will confine our discussion of the record to that question.
It may be conceded that all proceedings had for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haverbekken v. Hale, County JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- Ryan v. North Alaska Salmon Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Ayer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- In re Third, Fourth & Fifth Avenues, SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Robertson Lumber Co. v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scanlan v. Gulf Bitulithic Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Emergency Clinic & Hospital v. Continental Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Coleman v. Archer CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- City of Dallas v. SaengerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- City of Dallas v. SaengerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.