Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Saenger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1923No. 8984Published

1Opinion of the CourtJones, C. J.

The city of Dallas, under the provisions of its charter and amendments thereto, ordered the pavement of the southern portion of Holmes street, and entered into contract with Central Bitulithic Company to lay a bitulithic pavement and curbing along the portion of the street to be paved. Mrs. Saenger owned a block of land i fronting on Holmes street 1,314 feet. The I costs assessed against the Saenger property I was $9,097.84 as' its proportionate share for the entire work included in the contract with the paving company. The city took all of the necessary steps required by the charter to fix…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elmendorf v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. City of Corsicana v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Jones v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Dillon v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. City of Dallas v. BergfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API