Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Saenger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1923No. 8984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The city of Dallas, under the provisions of its charter and amendments thereto, ordered the pavement of the southern portion of Holmes street, and entered into contract with Central Bitulithic Company to lay a bitulithic pavement and curbing along the portion of the street to be paved. Mrs. Saenger owned a block of land fronting on Holmes street 1,314 feet. The costs assessed against the Saenger property was $9,097.84 as its proportionate share for the entire work included in the contract with the paving company. The city took all of the necessary steps required by the charter to fix and make…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elmendorf v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. City of Corsicana v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Jones v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Dillon v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. City of Dallas v. BergfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clower v. Fannin-Lamar-Delta Counties Levee Improvement Dist. No. 3Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Uvalde Paving Co. v. CrabbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Uvalde Paving Co. v. CrabbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API