Legal Opinion

State v. Good

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2002No. 99-050PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Danny Carl Good (Good) appeals from the Fourth Judicial District Court’s denial of his motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds and his conviction of sexual abuse of children. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for a new trial.

¶2 The following issues are presented on appeal:

¶3 (1) Was Good denied his right to speedy trial?

¶4 (2) Is Good entitled to a new trial due to the District Court’s denial of three of Good’s challenges for cause during voir dire?

¶5 (3) Did the District Court err when it allowed the prosecution to suggest on cross-examination that Good had committed acts of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. State v. Van KirkMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. City of Billings v. BruceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. LaMereMontana Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. State v. AriegweMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. MageeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  4. State v. HerrmanMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. HeathMontana Supreme Court · 2004

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API