Legal Opinion

State v. HEAFNER

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2010No. DA 09-0364PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice McGRATH

¶1 This appeal involves the validity of the conditions of a criminal sentence, and more particularly the remedy to be imposed where discrete conditions of a sentence are illegal. We review a sentence involving incarceration of a year or more for legality. State v. Ruiz, 2005 MT 117, ¶ 8, 327 Mont. 109, 112 P.3d 1001.

¶2 In January, 2008, Heafner participated in planning and carrying out a home-invasion burglary that left the homeowner so badly beaten that he is disfigured and permanently and severely disabled with brain injuries. Heafner drove his two accomplices to the crime scene, waited in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. AriegweMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. HicksMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. HeathMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BurchMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. RuizMontana Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. AragonMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. GuillMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. ChampagneMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. PetersenMontana Supreme Court · 2011

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API