Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Unseld

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 18, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett. S.

In this proceeding under section 211-b of the Surrogate’s Court Act, the validity of the claim of the Department of Mental Hygiene is in issue.

The testatrix died on December 16, 1963 leaving a daughter, Louise, a patient in the Kings Park State Hospital. The date this daughter entered the hospital is unknown but on March 6, 1952, a special agent of the Department of Mental Hygiene wrote the testatrix to the effect that although the actual cost of hospitalization for her daughter was $85 per month, they were willing to accept $12 per month toward this cost, but reserved the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
  2. Rieseberg v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tinnerholm v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Santangelo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Tinnerholm v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. Ruotolo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API