Legal Opinion
Rieseberg v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided October 26, 1963No. Claim No. 37078; Claim No. 37079; Claim No. 37080; Claim No. 37081PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn Carroll Young, J.
These claims alleging negligence were timely filed on September 30, 1959, pursuant to separate enabling acts (L. 1959, chs. 685-688) which became law on April 22, 1959. Subsequent to the passage of the enabling acts, the claims have been prosecuted with due diligence. None of these claims has been assigned or, except as hereinafter mentioned, submitted to any other court or tribunal for audit or determination. They arose out of an automobile accident which occurred on August 19, 1950.
*678On that date, at about 3:15 p.m., Orrin J. Thorne was operating his 1936 Ford, four-door sedan, with his wife,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Oswego Syracuse R.R. Co. v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Munro v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Johnson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Goldstein v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Cole v. . the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ruotolo v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Stephens v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Santangelo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Jeter v. Ellenville Central School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Ruotolo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.