Legal Opinion

In Re Fadden

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 8, 1987No. 84-557PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

This case involves the propriety of court-ordered restitution to an arson victim for the intentional infliction of emotional distress, in accordance with the terms of a plea agreement under which petitioner was sentenced in an arson case. Richard Fadden (petitioner) appeals the Washington Superior Court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, which was brought under the provisions of 13 V.S.A. § 7131. We affirm.

Petitioner is not incarcerated, but he seeks relief from conditions of probation that require him to make restitution. On appeal, he challenges the evidentiary basis for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  2. In Re StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  3. State v. ThorstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Greenberg v. HadwenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  5. In Re KivelaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. State v. ForantSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. State v. BristolSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  4. State v. Billy Joe PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. In Re MoultonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API