Greenberg v. Hadwen
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The plaintiff appeals the denial of his request for an injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with a prescriptive easement that the plaintiff claims exists over a strip of the defendants’ land. We affirm.
The undisputed facts are as follows. The plaintiff’s land is contiguous to and west of the defendants’ land. An area of open land at the boundary between the parties’ lands is “land in common” and is used for the passage of people and vehicles, parking, loading and unloading of vehicles, and accumulation of rubbish. Between the land in common and a public street to the south…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Latchis v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- Russell v. PareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Plimpton v. ConverseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
- Patch v. BairdSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
3Cited by23 opinions
- Post & Beam Equities Group, LLC v. Sunne Village Development Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Rowe v. LavanwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Miller-Jenkins v. Miller-JenkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- In Re FaddenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Agway, Inc. v. MarottiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.