In Re Moulton
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.
The State appeals from a superior court order granting petitioner’s motion for post-conviction relief. We agree with its arguments that counsel had no duty to inform petitioner regarding parole eligibility and that the court’s conclusion that petitioner relied on a material misunderstanding is not supported by its findings. We therefore reverse and remand.
Petitioner was arraigned on a charge of sexual assault, and retained private counsel. A public defender was later appointed as co-counsel to assist in the defense. Petitioner entered a plea of nolo contendere pursuant to a plea agreement and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Krupp v. KruppSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Hill v. GrandeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Czere v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. ClearySupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- In re KirbySupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- State v. FiskSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- In Re HemingwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- In re H.T. & M.L., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.