Legal Opinion

In Re Moulton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 26, 1992No. 91-328PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.

The State appeals from a superior court order granting petitioner’s motion for post-conviction relief. We agree with its arguments that counsel had no duty to inform petitioner regarding parole eligibility and that the court’s conclusion that petitioner relied on a material misunderstanding is not supported by its findings. We therefore reverse and remand.

Petitioner was arraigned on a charge of sexual assault, and retained private counsel. A public defender was later appointed as co-counsel to assist in the defense. Petitioner entered a plea of nolo contendere pursuant to a plea agreement and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Krupp v. KruppSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  4. Hill v. GrandeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  5. Czere v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. ClearySupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. In re KirbySupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  3. State v. FiskSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. In Re HemingwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. In re H.T. & M.L., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API