Legal Opinion

State v. Riley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 2004No. 200111460, 200117638 A116629 (Control), A116708PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant appeals judgments of conviction on one count of burglary in the first degree and one count of assault in the second degree. The cases are consolidated on appeal. With respect to both convictions, he asserts that the trial court erred by using a juvenile adjudication in the calculation of his criminal history score, resulting in a longer sentence than he would have received if the adjudication had not been used. With respect to the burglary conviction, he asserts that the court erred by adding a term to the judgment of conviction after the notice of appeal was filed, by doing so…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. United States v. Shannon Wayne TigheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Anthony J. SmalleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Fuerte-CoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. State v. BaccaroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. HornerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API