Legal Opinion
Board of County Commissioners v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 4, 2015No. 112,277PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
P. THOMAS THORNBRUGCH, Judge.
1 The: Oklahoma Department of Corree-tions (DOC) appeals the declaratory judgment of the district court holding that 57 0.8,2011 §§ 37 and 38 act unconstitutionally if counties are required to spend more than the maximum reimbursement stated by § 38 to hold. a state inmate. We affirm the Judgment of the district.court.
BACKGROUND
T2 This case involves the interaction between a state statute and the Oklahoma Constitution. The statute, 57 0.8.2011'§ 38, sets a maximum réimbursement rate of $27 per day for any county keeping a state inmate at a county facility after…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Independent School District No. 9 v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services ex rel. Jones v. BaggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Gordon v. FollowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- In Re Supreme Court Adjudication of Sufficiency of Initiative Petition in TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. ASHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- OKLAHOMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS v. BYRDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- OKLAHOMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS v. BYRDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023