Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchance Commission v. Olins
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 25, 2011No. C-07-6423 MMCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND MONETARY REMEDIES
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) “Motion for Injunctive Relief and Monetary-Remedies,” filed July 21, 2010. Defendants Robert Olins (“Olins”) and Argyle Capital Management Corporation (“Argyle”) (collectively, “defendants”) have filed opposition, to which the SEC has replied. 1 Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court hereby rules as follows. 2
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. H. Thomas FehnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Thomas James Associates, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SchoolerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. ChenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Pacific West Capital Group, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2023
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Crypto Traders Management, LLCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024