Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Schooler

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 19, 2015No. Case No. 3:12-cv-2164-GPC-JMAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER:(1)AMENDING THE COURT’S APRIL 3, 2015, ORDER;(2)GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE SEC’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ITS FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF;(3)DENYING AS MOOT THE SEC’S AMENDED MOTION;(4)DENYING AS MOOT THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR RESCHEDULING OF HEARING DATES AND MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE;(5)VACATING HEARING DATE

GONZALO P. CURIEL, District Judge.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), the Court finds it appropriate to amend its April 3, 2015, Order Denying the SEC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief. (ECF No.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API