Legal Opinion

Coultas v. City of Sutherlin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1994No. OTC 3267; SC S40261PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

Plaintiffs appeal a dismissal of their complaint by the Tax Court, which resulted from two orders issued pursuant to Tax Court Rule (TCR) 21, one granting defendant’s motion to strike 1 and the other granting defendant’s motion to make definite and certain. For the reasons that follow, the judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.

In May 1992, the voters of the City of Sutherlin voted on two ballot measures referred to them by the Sutherlin City Council. Ballot Measure 10-06 proposed to increase the city’s tax base from $139,055 to $873,320. Ballot Measure 10-07 proposed to amend the Sutherlin…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Roseburg School District v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Lipscomb v. State Bd. of Higher Ed.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. School Dist. 1, Mult. Co. v. BinghamOregon Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ellis v. LoratiOregon Tax Court · 1999
  3. Li v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Flavorland Foods v. Washington County AssessorOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Martin v. City of TigardOregon Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API