Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Viust

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 30, 2013No. 12-P-344PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgnes, J.

During the murder trial of Robert B. Vacher, John A. Viust, Jr., was called by the Commonwealth as a witness. Viust had the assistance of counsel. After hearing from Viust’s counsel, the judge explained the law to Viust, and warned him that he would be found in contempt if he did not testify. Viust refused to testify. The judge found him in summary contempt under Mass.R.Crim.P. 43, 378 Mass. 919 (1979) (rule 43). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the summary criminal contempt finding.

Background. Vacher’s trial began on November 7, 2011. On *309November 17, 2011, the Commonwealth called Viust…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. In Re McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. CorsettiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of West Virginia v. Daniel L. HerbertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State of West Virginia v. Daniel L. HerbertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API