Mason v. Chrysler Corp.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs, Maurine Mason and his wife Mamie Mason, appeal from a summary judgment entered for the defendants Chrysler Corporation and its dealer, Royal Motor Company, in an action to recover for fraud. We affirm.
A summary judgment is proper and must be affirmed on appeal if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, Ala.R.Civ.P.; Gray v. Liberty Nat'l Life Ins. Co.,623 So.2d 1156 (Ala. 1993). We review a summary judgment by the "substantial evidence" rule. Under this rule, once the movant has made a prima facie…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Fincher v. Robinson Bros. Lincoln-MercurySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Bama Budweiser v. Anheuser-BuschSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Henson v. Celtic Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Garcia v. Chrysler Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- In Re Gen. Motors Corp. Anti-Lock Brake Products Liability Lit.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
- Freightliner v. Whatley Contract CarriersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.