Legal Opinion

Mason v. Chrysler Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 20, 1995No. 1931199PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, Maurine Mason and his wife Mamie Mason, appeal from a summary judgment entered for the defendants Chrysler Corporation and its dealer, Royal Motor Company, in an action to recover for fraud. We affirm.

A summary judgment is proper and must be affirmed on appeal if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, Ala.R.Civ.P.; Gray v. Liberty Nat'l Life Ins. Co.,623 So.2d 1156 (Ala. 1993). We review a summary judgment by the "substantial evidence" rule. Under this rule, once the movant has made a prima facie…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Fincher v. Robinson Bros. Lincoln-MercurySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Bama Budweiser v. Anheuser-BuschSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Henson v. Celtic Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Garcia v. Chrysler Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. In Re Gen. Motors Corp. Anti-Lock Brake Products Liability Lit.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
  5. Freightliner v. Whatley Contract CarriersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API