Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Chrysler Group LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 1, 2015No. 14-cv-8926 (KBF)PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge:

Defendant FCA U.S. LLC, more commonly known as “Chrysler,” manufactures vehicles that have a key component known as the “Totally Integrated Power Module,” or “TIPM.” The TIPM functions as *216a vehicle’s electronic nerve center, and it is responsible for controlling and distributing power to all of the vehicle’s electrical functions, including its ignition and safety systems, fuel pump, airbags, windshield wipers, turn signals, and headlights and taillights. Plaintiffs allege that a common defect in their vehicles’ TIPMs infected 65 different…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Catalano v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Mumin v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  4. Amin v. Mercedes-Benz United States, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  5. In re Hardieplank Fiber Cement Siding Litig.District Court, D. Maine · 2018

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API