State v. Parker
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction by a Kit-sap County jury of driving while intoxicated. The appeal raises one question of first impression. Was defendant’s refusal to take a Breathalyzer test admissible on the issue of his guilt?
Over objection, the State was allowed to introduce evidence that defendant refused the Breathalyzer test shortly after his arrest. Later the jury was instructed that it could consider his refusal in determining guilt or innocence, 1 and the State was permitted to argue the refusal as an admission of guilt. We think these rulings were erroneous and order a new trial.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Westerville v. CunninghamOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Bush v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- State v. SeversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Duckworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- State v. ZwickerWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. CharlesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Puller v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. StaeheliWashington Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.