Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Charles

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1979No. 2266PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*283LIPEZ, Judge:

Appellant was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol.1 At the trial, a state trooper testified for the Commonwealth, over objection, that appellant had refused to submit to blood and breathalyzer tests. We conclude that such evidence is inadmissible.2

Evidence of refusal to take such tests was admissible under section 624.1(h) of the now-repealed Vehicle Code of 1959 (1959 Code).3 The 1959 Code also provided:

If any person is placed under arrest and charged with the operation of a motor vehicle or tractor while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GoosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Salt Lake City v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  4. Puller v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. United States v. Konovsky. United States v. BraniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Latella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Sabella, D. v. Appalachian Development Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. MainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Williams v. WynderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Humphreys v. DeRossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API