Legal Opinion

Matter of Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1991No. 18S00-8802-DI-255, 18S00-8808-DI-780PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before us on two verified complaints for disciplinary action which, upon the joint motion of all parties, were consolidated. - Respondent Merrill Smith has been charged in two counts with violating Disciplinary Rule 5-101(A), 5-104, 1-102(A)(4) and (5), and 2-105(A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility for Attor-meys at Law. Respondent Gregory Smith has been charged with violating DR 5-101(A) and 1-102(A)(4) of the Code. After a hearing, the Hon. John L. Kellam, who was appointed Hearing Officer in this case, has submitted his findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Both…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In Re ImmingIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BehnkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Matter of KernIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Matter of Discipline of TheodosenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Liggett v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Matter of CawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. BERNER CHEESE CORPORATION v. KrugWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Matter of MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API