Matter of Myers
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
Respondent Harold W. Myers, an attorney admitted to practice in this state in 1970, has been charged with lawyer misconduct stemming from a fee dispute with a client pursuant to a contingency fee arrangement. The Disciplinary Commission and the respondent have submitted for our approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline, pursuant to Ind. sion and Discipline Rule 28, Section l1(g) 1 In the proffered agreement, the parties agree that a public reprimand is an appropriate discipline for the respondent's actions. We now find that the parties'…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Johnson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Cardenas v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Matter of GerardIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- Hoover Slovacek LLP v. WaltonTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Galanis v. Lyons & TruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Levine v. Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Matter of LehmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re HaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.