Legal Opinion
In Re Samuel R. PIERCE, Jr. (Abrams Fee Application)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 28, 1999No. 89-0005PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
This matter coming to be heard and being heard before the Special Division of the Court upon the application of Philip Abrams for reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to section 593(f) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as amended, 28 U.S.C. § 591 et seq. (1994), and it appearing to the court for the reasons set forth more fully in the opinion filed contemporaneously herewith, that the motion is in part well taken, it is hereby
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the United States reimburse Philip Abrams for attorneys’ fees and expenses he incurred during the…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re Theodore B. OLSONCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- In Re Oliver L. North (Bush Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- In Re Raymond J. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by29 opinions
- Michigan v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Gratz v. BollingerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Potter v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- New York v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- In Re: Bruce Edward BabbittCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.