Legal Opinion

New York v. Microsoft Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 22, 2003No. CIV.A.98-1233(CKK)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Currently pending before the Court is the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’s (“Massachusetts” or “Plaintiff’) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses. Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft” or “Defendant”) opposes Plaintiffs motion, arguing that Massachusetts’s request should be substantially reduced or denied entirely. After reviewing Plaintiffs Statement of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Attorneys Fees (“Pl.’s Mem.”), Defendant’s Opposition, and Plaintiffs Reply, the Court provided Microsoft the opportunity to supplement its…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McClam v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust LitigationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Johnson v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Cox v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Carmel & Carmel PC v. Dellis Construction, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API