Legal Opinion

In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 30, 1993No. Division 86-6PublishedCited by 108 opinions

(Division for the Purpose of Appointing Independent Counsels Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as Amended).

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam 1

This matter coming on to be heard and being heard before the Special Division of the Court, upon the application of Robert C. Dutton for reimbursement of Attorney Fees pursuant to § 593(f) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as Amended, 28 U.S.C. § 591 et seq. (1987), and it appearing to the Court for the reasons more fully set forth in the Opinion filed contemporaneously herewith, that the motion is well taken, in part, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the United States reimburse Robert C. Dutton for attorneys’ fees he incurred during the investigation of Independent…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

3Cases cited11 opinions

Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
In Re Theodore B. OLSONCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
In Re Raymond J. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by108 opinions

In Re Oliver L. North (Bush Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
In Re Oliver L. North (Shultz Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
In Re Oliver L. North (Reagan Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
In Re Samuel R. PIERCE, Jr. (Kisner Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
Samuel R. PierceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.