Legal Opinion
In Re: Bruce Edward Babbitt
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 28, 2002No. 98-0001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Special Court filed PER CURIAM.
Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge CUDAHY.
ORDER
2Per curiam
■ This matter coming to be heard and being heard before the Special Division of *929the Court upon the petition of Catherine Baker Stetson for reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to section 593(f) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as amended, 28 U.S.C. § 591 et seq. (1994), and it appearing to the court- for the reasons set forth more fully in the opinion filed contemporaneously herewith that the petition is not well taken, it is hereby
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Oliver L. North (Bush Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- In Re Franklyn C. NOFZIGERCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- In Re Samuel R. PIERCE, Jr. (Kisner Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- In Re: Bruce Edward BabbittCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- In re: Babbitt v. (Thornberry Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- In re: Babbitt v. (Thornberry Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002