Legal Opinion

People v. Caldwell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Hillsdale; Lane, J. Henry W. Caldwell was convicted of violating the local option law.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Respondent was convicted of keeping a place where intoxicating liquors were sold as a beverage, in violation of the local option law in Hillsdale county.

1. It is contended that the justice acquired no jurisdiction to issue the warrant, for the reason that there was no evidence before him that the local option law was in force in that county. On the examination a motion was made to discharge the respondent for that reason, and such motion was again made in the circuit court at the time respondent was arraigned. Respondent contends that the only evidence of that fact before the justice was the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Cousins v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. KeeferMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. DeitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People v. BechtelMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ManleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. People v. LockhartMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. People v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API