Legal Opinion
Petri v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 18, 2012No. 11-155CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Plaintiff Matthew S. Petri was a Captain in the Minnesota Air National Guard, who was activated into the United States Air Force, until he was separated from active duty on March 13, 2006, due to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Mr. Petri argues that the Air Force acted improperly in the administration and effectuation of his separation. Mr. Petri seeks (1) all pay and allowances allegedly wrongfully denied him and continuation of such pay until a final review and determination as to his physical disability is made by the Secretary of the Air Force,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blair Coleman v. Frank KendallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- Hatmaker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Cook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Wollman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Silbaugh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.