United States v. Jose Emilio Cortez-Arias
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on April 18, 2005 and published at 403 F.3d 11.11, is AMENDED as follows.
Footnote 8 states:
Because the sentencing enhancement we address is based only on the fact of a prior conviction, our decision is unaffected by the Supreme Court’s recent holding in United States v. Booker , — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 397 F.3d 1248, 1255 n. 8 (9th Cir.2005).
Footnote 8 is deleted in its entirety and replaced it with the following language:
Because Cortez-Arias waived all appellate rights except for the sole issue of whether…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Martin CardenasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Isidro Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Cortez-AriasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Librado Lopez-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Cortez-AriasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. SuiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.