Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Emilio Cortez-Arias

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 14, 2005No. 04-10184PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed on April 18, 2005 and published at 403 F.3d 11.11, is AMENDED as follows.

Footnote 8 states:

Because the sentencing enhancement we address is based only on the fact of a prior conviction, our decision is unaffected by the Supreme Court’s recent holding in United States v. Booker , — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 397 F.3d 1248, 1255 n. 8 (9th Cir.2005).

Footnote 8 is deleted in its entirety and replaced it with the following language:

Because Cortez-Arias waived all appellate rights except for the sole issue of whether…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Martin CardenasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Isidro Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Cortez-AriasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Librado Lopez-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Cortez-AriasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. SuiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API